Iron Man. Robert Downey Jr.
There were obvious shades of Transformer in this movie: the desert missions and the giant robot-man at the end of the movie. Tony Stark is a more charismatic hybrid of Batman and Q from the James Bond films. I liked the character-defining scenes where he seduces Christine into bed, then Jim into a good time. It was a cute "show, not tell" way of defining Stark as a man people didn't say no to and it worked. I didn't find his overall arc very interesting though. He saw his weapons being used by the bad guys so he decided to become a weapon against the bad guys. There are some murky ethical issues there that would make this review even longer than it already is. :P
The antagonists could have been handled a great deal better. Having not one, but two un-conflicted bad guys just padded the story. The Afghans terrorists were two-dimensionally stereotyped - stupid, greedy, evil and cowardly. Jeff Bridges' character made sense as the greedy Wall Street terrorist/weapons dealer who uses others to do his own dirty work. Why he decided to done the Iron Man suit and go crazy on the metropolis was nonsensical. I was actually disappointed that it wasn't revealed he was behind Stark's parents' death.
On the upside, I enjoyed watching the characters of Jim and Yinsen. Jim was a good friend - almost too good to be true. I wouldn't have taken being stood up at that Award Ceremony so lightly. I lol'd at the scene where he takes a look at the second Iron Man suit and then says, "next time." There's an interesting relationship there. If I wrote fan fic, that'd be the relationship I'd be exploring. Yinsen was definitely too good to be true. I knew he won't make it out of the camp five seconds into his meeting with Stark. I liked seeing a good Afghan for a change but there's still the part of me that sees him as more stereotyping - the Afghans were all either 100% good or 100% evil, no shades of grey, no attempt to define the reasons for their war beyond World Domination.
As for the XX factor, it's not by much because they both have issues, but give me the ruthless Christine over Saint Pepper any day. In the unlikely event I get into the fandom, I'd be shipping Stark/Christine and not just because I'd like the bad girl to win. Unlike
This a mystery thriller so there isn't much of anything I can reveal without spoilers.
So once again: Beware of Spoilers!!!
For a mystery, it was quite fair. I think they could have played up the possibility of Forster's innocence for a more dramatic impact. I Totally Called the Blonde Chick as the murderer! It was a classic textbook clue - the cries for help, the attacked who mysteriously vanishes into the car park - an attacker whose M.O. has always been home assaults. There were some unfair red herrings: The eye contact between Dr. Grahm's escort and Kim's ex-boyfriend/husband implied a relationship that turned out to be non-existent. Also, no reason was given for Kim's sudden decision to leave the escort's apartment - and it's physically impossible for Blonde Chick to have bodily taken her from there even under duress.
As a thriller, I guess it worked. I'm too jaded to give a fair assessment though. I thought the murder scenes were graphic and horrendous and it's particularly nasty during the first few minutes of the movie.
I am still thinking about the murderer's motivations and her decision to give up her free will to her lover. Was Blonde Chick already crazy and did Forster just provided one out of many possible outlets for her deep-seated mania? Left on her own, would she have become another mass murderer? Or could she have been saved? Did Forster destroy a woman's soul while in prison?
On a lighter note, it was good to see Benjamin MacKenzie again, better known as Ryan from the O.C. I kept calling him "Ryan" throughout the movie. Heck, he was even wearing one of Ryan's shirts.